Comparison Between Impulse and Reaction Steam Turbines

"Loved our blog? Share the knowledge!

Page Contents

Comparison Between Impulse and Reaction Steam Turbines: Choosing the Right Power Solution

Steam turbines are vital in converting steam energy into mechanical energy, playing a crucial role in electricity generation, marine propulsion, and industrial applications. Among the different types of steam turbines, impulse and reaction turbines are the most widely used. But what sets them apart? And how can choosing the right one impact the efficiency of your operations? Let’s break down these turbine types, explore their differences, and see where each excels, all in a relatable and straightforward manner.

The Basics: What Are Impulse and Reaction Turbines?

First, let’s start with what these turbines are:

Impulse Turbines: These turbines operate on the principle of converting the kinetic energy of steam into mechanical energy. High-pressure steam is directed onto blades mounted on a rotor. The steam’s force causes the blades to move, spinning the rotor and generating power. The classic example is the De Laval turbine, which pioneered this approach.
Reaction Turbines: On the other hand, these turbines work on pressure and kinetic energy. The steam expands as it passes over the blades, causing both a push and a reaction that rotates the blades. In a reaction turbine, the moving blades contribute to the pressure drop. The Parsons turbine, developed by Sir Charles Parsons, is the hallmark of this type.

How Do They Work?

Impulse turbines are more straightforward in design. Steam enters the turbine through nozzles that convert high-pressure steam into high-velocity jets. These jets hit the rotor blades, changing direction and imparting momentum to the rotor. The essential characteristic here is that all the pressure drop happens in the nozzle; the blades merely convert kinetic energy to mechanical energy without a further pressure change.

Reaction turbines function differently. The steam flows over both fixed and moving blades. The fixed blades act as nozzles, creating velocity and some pressure drop, while the moving blades continue to expand the steam, converting additional pressure into mechanical energy. Thus, the pressure drop happens gradually across stationary and rotating blades, making the energy transfer continuous.

Key Differences: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Energy Conversion Principle:
- Impulse Turbines: Convert kinetic energy only.
- Reaction Turbines: Utilize both pressure energy and kinetic energy.
Pressure Drop:
- Impulse: Occurs solely in the nozzles.
- Reaction: Distributed across fixed and moving blades.
Blade Design:
- Impulse: The blades are shaped to redirect steam flow without pressure drop.
- Reaction: The blades are designed to allow expansion and pressure drop within them.
Size and Complexity:
- Impulse: Generally more straightforward and compact, easier to maintain.
- Reaction: Larger due to the need for a more extended pressure gradient and complex structure.
Efficiency at Partial Load:
- Impulse: Tends to perform consistently well at partial loads.
- Reaction: This may be less efficient at partial loads but shines under full load.

Comparison Aspect	Impulse Turbine	Reaction Turbine
Steam Expansion	Steam expands entirely in the nozzle. Pressure remains constant over the moving blades.	Steam expands in both fixed and moving blades continuously, with a gradual pressure drop across both.
Blade Passage	Constant cross-sectional area; no steam expansion.	Variable cross-sectional area (converging type) due to steam expansion.
Steam Velocity in Moving Blades	The relative velocity of steam remains constant as pressure is constant in moving blades.	Relative velocity increases due to the continuous expansion of steam.
Blade Profile	Symmetrical profile; simpler to manufacture.	Aerofoil, non-symmetrical profile; more complex to manufacture.
Steam and Running Speed	High due to large pressure drop in nozzles.	Lower due to smaller pressure drop in each stage.
Number of Stages	Due to a significant pressure drop per stage, there are fewer stages, resulting in a smaller turbine size for the same power output.	Reaction turbines are multi-stage, and more stages are required due to a smaller pressure drop per stage. This results in a larger turbine size for the same power output.
Space Occupied per Unit Power	Occupies less space.	Occupies more space.
Suitability	More suitable for small power outputs.	More suitable for medium and higher power outputs.

Real-Life Examples and Use Cases

One of my favorite real-world examples of an impulse turbine is its application in industrial plants where space is at a premium. Impulse turbines’ straightforward design makes them compact and simple to service. For instance, a small-scale power generation setup in an urban area might opt for an impulse turbine to maximize space efficiency and simplify maintenance routines.

On the other hand, reaction turbines find their true calling in large power stations. For example, a significant power plant generates electricity for an entire city. Here, the increased efficiency of a reaction turbine under full load can make a substantial difference in fuel consumption and overall output. The continuous pressure drop in reaction turbines allows them to harness more energy from the steam, which is crucial for large-scale operations where efficiency translates directly into cost savings.

Personal Take: Choosing Between Impulse and Reaction Turbines

I remember a conversation with an engineer at a power plant who joked that “choosing between an impulse and a reaction turbine is like picking between a reliable hatchback and a luxury sedan.” Both will get you where you need to go, but the choice depends on what you value more—simplicity and ease of maintenance or full-scale efficiency and output.

When advising clients on turbine selection, I often ask them to consider space, load consistency, and maintenance capabilities. An impulse turbine’s simplicity could be a lifesaver for industries with tight maintenance schedules or limited personnel. However, investing in a reaction turbine would be a wise choice if you’re running a large power facility where maximizing every drop of energy counts.

Practical Advice for Engineers and Plant Managers

Consider Load Variations: If your facility experiences varying loads, an impulse turbine’s stable performance at partial loads may be beneficial. Reaction turbines, while highly efficient at full load, can see efficiency drops at lower loads.
Evaluate Long-Term Costs: While impulse turbines may be cheaper upfront and more straightforward to maintain, the fuel efficiency of reaction turbines can lead to significant savings over time, especially in large-scale applications.
Think About Space: If your setup has limited space, impulse turbines, with their compact design, are usually a better fit. Reaction turbines, due to their larger size, require more space for installation.

Conclusion

Choosing between an impulse and a reaction turbine is more than just a technical decision—it’s about aligning your energy generation needs with your operational goals. Whether after simplicity and reliability or aiming for maximum efficiency, understanding these turbines’ strengths and weaknesses helps make an informed choice that optimizes performance and keeps costs manageable.

Ultimately, both turbine types have proven to be worth time and again. Whether walking through the whirring, steam-filled corridors of a sprawling power plant or inspecting a compact urban power station, knowing which turbine is behind the scenes gives you insight into how power is efficiently generated to keep the world running.